Browse by Stream
QnA
Home
QnA
Go To Your Study Dashboard

Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa
  • Home
  • Law
  • Ketan offered to purchase a home owned by Chetan for 10,00,000. He wrote to Chetan's agent asking whether his

Ketan offered to purchase a home owned by Chetan for 10,00,000. He wrote to Chetan's agent asking whether his offer was accepted. He also added that he was ready to accept any higher price if found reasonable. The agent of Chetan, Shyam sunder replied, would not accept less than 20,00,000. Ketan accepted this and brought a suit in a local court for specific performance. Is Chetan liable for specific performance?

Option: 1

pawan is liable for the specific performance of the contract entered into Diu and Pawan.


Option: 2

Pawan is not liable


Option: 3

The contract is void ab intio.

 


Option: 4

 The contract is voidable


Answers (1)

best_answer

Pawan is not liable because there is only and invitation to offer from Pawan’s agent. There is no meeting of the minds, hence no valid contract can be formed. hence option B is correct

Posted by

manish

View full answer

Similar Questions

Trending Articles/News

anam-khan

Revise CLAT 2025 results, republish merit list in four weeks: Delhi High Court tells Consortium of NLUs
anam-khan

Intend to complete CLAT UG hearing at earliest for results to be declared: Delhi HC
anam-khan

CLAT 2025 LIVE: Delhi High Court reserves UG verdict, PG hearing on April 21

Latest Question