Q1.5 No physicist has ever “seen” an electron. Yet, all physicists believe in the existence of electrons. An intelligent but superstitious man advances this analogy to argue that ‘ghosts’ exist even though no one has ‘seen’ one. How will you refute his argument?
This argument can be refused as the complete physics (theorems) depends upon the fact that the nucleus contains electrons. Whereas there is no advancement of human in agreeing with the existence of ghosts.