Browse by Stream
Discuss Doubts
Home
Search for Exam, Articles, Questions
get app
Go To Your Study Dashboard
  1. Home
  2. Examine if Rolle’s theorem is applicable to any of the following functions. Can you say some thing about the converse of Rolle’s theorem from these example? f (x) = [x] for x Î [– 2, 2]

Filters

Select Stream
Select Type
Select Exam
Select Subject
Select Chapter
Select Exercise
Q&A - Ask Doubts and Get Answers
Q
NCERT

Examine if Rolle’s theorem is applicable to any of the following functions. Can you say some thing about the converse of Rolle’s theorem from these example? f (x) = [x] for x Î [– 2, 2]

Q2 (2)   Examine if Rolle’s theorem is applicable to any of the following functions. Can you say some thing about the converse of Rolle’s theorem from these example?

    f (x) = [x] \: \:for \: \: x \epsilon [ -2,2]

Answers (1)
Views
G Gautam harsolia

According to Rolle's theorem function must be
a )  continuous in given closed interval say [x,y] 
b ) differentiable in given open interval say (x,y)
c ) f(x) = f(y)
Then their exist a c \ \epsilon \ (x,y)  such that   f^{'}(c)= 0
If all these conditions are satisfies then we can verify  Rolle's theorem 
Given function is 
 f (x) = [x] 
It is clear that Given function f (x) = [x] is not  continuous for each and every point in [-2,2]
Now, lets check differentiability of f(x)
L.H.L. at x = n , n \ \epsilon \ [-2,2]
\lim_{h\rightarrow 0^-}\frac{f(n+h)-f(n)}{h} = \lim_{h\rightarrow 0^-}\frac{[n+h]-[n]}{h} = \lim_{h\rightarrow 0^-}\frac{n-1-n}{h} = \lim_{h\rightarrow 0^-}\frac{-1}{h}= -\infty
                                                                                                                                ( [n+h]=n-1 \because h < 0 \ therefore \ (n+h)<n)
Now,
R.H.L. at x = n , n \ \epsilon \ [-2,2]
\lim_{h\rightarrow 0^+}\frac{f(n+h)-f(n)}{h} = \lim_{h\rightarrow 0^+}\frac{[n+h]-[n]}{h} = \lim_{h\rightarrow 0^+}\frac{n-n}{h} = \lim_{h\rightarrow 0^-}\frac{0}{h}=0
                                                                                                                                   ( [n+h]=n \because h > 0 \ therefore \ (n+h)>n)
We can clearly see that R.H.L. is not equal to L.H.L.
Therefore, function is not differential in (-2,2)
Hence, Rolle's theorem is not applicable for given function   f (x) = [x]    ,  x \ \epsilon \ [-2,2]

Similar Questions

Related Chapters

Exams
Articles
Questions