Arun’s name was removed from voter’s list due to which Arun was not able to vote. What can be the remedy provided to Arun by the Court ?
His legal right to vote was violated and compensation will be granted to the plaintiff.
His legal right to vote was not violated and compensation will not be granted to the plaintiff.
Compensation will not be granted to the plaintiff as there is no contract.
None of the above.
The principle of injuria sine damnum recognizes the right of a plaintiff to sue for damages, even in cases where there is no actual loss or damage, but where a legal right has been infringed. Here, Arun’s Legal right to vote was infringed. Hence, Option a is correct.