Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa

How did the S.P. Gupta case balance the roles of the executive and the judiciary in judicial appointments and transfers?

Option: 1

It gave the executive complete authority


Option: 2

It excluded the executive from the process


Option: 3

It ensured that the executive had some say, but not at the expense of judicial independence


Option: 4

It made the CJI the sole decision-maker


Answers (1)

best_answer

The case struck a balance by affirming that the executive should have some say in appointments and transfers, but not to the detriment of judicial independence. hence option c is correct.

Posted by

Rishi

View full answer