In the famous case of Shayara Bano v. Union of India & Others, the Indian Supreme Court looked at the "Triple Talaq" custom as it applied to Muslim personal law. Which of the following best captures the core of the judgement of this practise?
The Court affirmed Triple Talaq because it is a crucial component of Islamic personal law and is guaranteed by Article 25 of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court declared Triple Talaq to be illegal, but it also urged the Parliament to include the Talaq laws in the Quran
The Court ruled that Triple Talaq was not a fundamental religious practise and that it was therefore unlawful
The judgement advocated for Triple Talaq to be used with few limitations and only after unsuccessful attempts for mediation
every religious practise must follow the fundamental pratise and triple talaq was no where an essential practise . hence option C is the best suitable answer.