Browse by Stream
QnA
Home
QnA
Go To Your Study Dashboard

Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa
  • Home
  • Law
  • In the landmark case of Danial Lati

In the landmark case of Danial Latifi v. Union of India (2001), the Supreme Court of India interpreted a provision of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. Which of the following statements correctly encapsulates the apex court's ruling in this case?

Option: 1

The court determined that Muslim males are not required to pay their divorced wives any maintenance beyond the iddat period.


Option: 2

The Supreme Court ruled that a divorced Muslim woman could only be entitled to the'mehr' sum that was established at the time of the marriage


Option: 3

The Court found that, similar to Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), a Muslim divorced woman is entitled to maintenance for life or until she remarries


Option: 4

The Supreme Court clarified that while a Muslim husband is required to pay for his divorced wife's maintenance, it need only be done so during the iddat time; however, the amount should be sufficient to support her after the iddat.during the iddat time; however, the amount should be sufficient to support her after the iddat.


Answers (1)

best_answer

The Supreme Court made it clear that although a Muslim husband must provide for his divorced wife during the iddat period, the amount should be sufficient to maintain her after the iddat.During the iddat period, nevertheless, the sum should be enough to maintain her afterwards. Hence option D is the best suitable answer.

Posted by

Devendra Khairwa

View full answer

Similar Questions

Trending Articles/News

anam-khan

CLAT 2025 exam on December 1; check last-minute preparation tips to score well in law entrance exam
anam-khan

CLAT 2025: Consortium asks PwD candidates to inform for scribe by November 23
anam-khan

CLAT 2025 Admit Card (OUT) Live: Download NLU CLAT hall ticket at consortiumofnlus.ac.in

Latest Question