Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa

Legal entities, including companies, are given some rights and obligations that are equivalent to those of natural individuals in the federation of Legaltopia. An initiative that was recently established by BioTech Corp, a company under law, was contested on moral grounds by environmentalists. The protestors claimed that because BioTech Corp is a legal company and doesn't have a moral conscience like a person would, it shouldn't be allowed to work on morally challenging initiatives.

 

Which of the following concerns the conflict between BioTech Corp. and environmental activists the most?

Option: 1

In Legaltopia, how profitable is BioTech Corp?


Option: 2

Have the environmental campaigners ever taken on other businesses?


Option: 3

Does Legaltopia's jurisprudence require moral consciousness in order to carry out projects that have an ethical component?


Option: 4

Who are BioTech Corp.'s largest stockholders?


Answers (1)

The main question is whether the capacity for moral consciousness, which is normally associated with natural individuals, is a prerequisite in Legaltopia's legal framework for entities to engage in particular projects. For the issue to be settled, it is essential to comprehend this standard.Hence option C is correct .

Posted by

Kshitij

View full answer