Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa

 

What is the significance of ‘Rylands v. Fletcher’ rule ?

Option: 1

It introduced the concept of strict liability, which deviates from the usual tort law requirement of proving negligence or intent.

 

 

 

 


Option: 2

 

It underscores the principle that those who bring inherently dangerous or non-natural elements onto their land should bear the responsibility for any harm that results.

 

 


Option: 3

 

 

It has had a lasting impact on the development of tort law worldwide and is often cited in cases involving environmental harm, industrial accidents, and property damage.

 

 

 


Option: 4

 

All of the above 

 


Answers (1)

best_answer

Ryland v. Fletcher established the rule that one's non-natural use of their land, which leads to another's land being damaged as a result of dangerous things emanating from the land, is strictly liable. Hence, option (d) is correct.

 

Posted by

manish

View full answer