Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa

 A, before the making of the deed, which was subject to a mortgage, B was aware that the land would be exposed to sale and sold by way of lottery in an illegal manner contrary to the statute. Part of the purchase money was unpaid by A he made a covenant for payment. B sued A for payment based on this covenant. Decide?

Option: 1

Convenant was not clearly given by A.


Option: 2

Convenant was clearly given by A.


Option: 3

There should be no Convenant in this scenario.


Option: 4

 None of the above.


Answers (1)

best_answer

Convenant was clearly given by A to secure the payment of a part of the purchase or consideration money for the lands, the subject of the agreement. Hence option (B) is the correct answer.

Posted by

chirag

View full answer