Browse by Stream
QnA
Home
QnA
Go To Your Study Dashboard

Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa
  • Home
  • Law
  •  A well-known gallery sold a work of art to M

 A well-known gallery sold a work of art to Ms. Anika. She is free to retain it, show it, lend it out, or even toss it out if she so chooses. The artwork cannot be duplicated or sold by Anika because the creator has kept the copyright. Her friend Mr. Rohan contends that she doesn't actually "own" the artwork because she lacks the authorization to copy it.

 

Question:

 

Which of the following best represents Ms. Anika's connection with the purchased art according to the ownership principles?

Option: 1

 Complete Ownership: Since Ms. Anika is the legal owner of the artwork, she is also granted full reproduction rights.


Option: 2

Limited Ownership: Ms. Anika owns ownership rights to the original work of art but not to any intellectual reproductions of it.


Option: 3

No Ownership: Ms. Anika has no legal claim to the artwork because she is unable to replicate it.


Option: 4

Joint Ownership: Ms. Anika and the artist each have an equal ownership interest in the piece of art.


Answers (1)

best_answer

In general, ownership means the right to keep something, utilise it, and get rid of it. Ms. Anika is permitted to own and utilise the artwork in this case, but she is not permitted to make copies of it because the artist has retained the copyright. Her ownership is so restricted.hence option b iss correct.

Posted by

Sanket Gandhi

View full answer

Similar Questions

Trending Articles/News

anam-khan

CLAT 2025 Hearing LIVE: Delhi HC seeks response from Consortium in 2 weeks; next hearing on April 7
anam-khan

CLAT PG counselling 2025 dates soon for LLM; category-wise expected cut-offs for top NLUs
anam-khan

CLAT 2025 counselling likely to begin after Delhi HC hearing on March 3; selection process explained

Latest Question