Palak accidentally receive a package of expensive electronics meant for Disha and Disha demand palak to return it without reimbursing palak for the shipping costs. Can palak claim restoration through quasi-contract?
Yes, because Palak received the package by mistake and should return it without any obligation from Disha
No, because Disha didn't intend to send the package to Palak, and Palak has no legal basis for claiming restoration
Yes, but only if Palak incurred additional expenses due to the mistake, such as shipping costs, which can be claimed through quasi-contract.
No, because Palak is obligated to return the package without any claim for restoration.
Palak can claim restoration through quasi-contract if she incurred additional expenses like shipping costs due to the mistake. Quasi-contracts are designed to prevent unjust enrichment, so if Palak had to spend money to return the package that was mistakenly sent to her, she may have a valid claim for those expenses.