Browse by Stream
QnA
Home
QnA
Go To Your Study Dashboard

Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa
  • Home
  • Law
  •  Rohan sold his business to Sam. Mani, an old customer sent an order for goods to Rohan by name. Sam, the ne

 Rohan sold his business to Sam. Mani, an old customer sent an order for goods to Rohan by name. Sam, the new owner, executed the order. Mani refuses to accept the goods from Sam as he intended to deal only with Rohan. There is a suit by Sam against Mani. Decide?

 

Option: 1

Sam cannot recover as Mani never intended to deal with him.


Option: 2

Can recover the price as he had supplied goods only against the order made by Mani.

 


Option: 3

Sam cannot recover as it was only an invitation to offer by Mani on which no acceptance can be given by Sam


Option: 4

Sam can recover as the price of the goods, as an offer once accepted results in a contract.


Answers (1)

best_answer

Sam cannot recover as it was only an invitation to offer by Mani on which no acceptance can be given by Sam. When an offer is not accepted by the intended person the contract is not completed. In this matter Mani has given the offer to the Rohan but it was executed by the Sam, Therefore, the said invitation to offer is not completed once it was not accepted by Rohan himself.

Posted by

himanshu.meshram

View full answer

Similar Questions

Trending Articles/News

anam-khan

CLAT 2025 counselling delayed: Consortium of NLUs to approach SC seeking relief against Delhi HC order
anam-khan

CLAT 2025 Result: Delhi HC refuses to intervene in order for revision
anam-khan

CLAT 2025 results likely to be revised; Delhi high court orders revision of merit list

Latest Question