-
Engineering and Architecture
Exams
Colleges
Predictors
Resources
-
Computer Application and IT
Quick Links
Colleges
-
Pharmacy
Colleges
Resources
-
Hospitality and Tourism
Colleges
Resources
Diploma Colleges
-
Competition
Other Exams
Resources
-
School
Exams
Top Schools
Products & Resources
-
Study Abroad
Top Countries
Student Visas
-
Arts, Commerce & Sciences
Exams
Colleges
Upcoming Events
Resources
-
Management and Business Administration
Colleges & Courses
Predictors
-
Learn
Online Courses
Engineering Preparation
Medical Preparation
-
Online Courses and Certifications
Top Streams
Specializations
- Digital Marketing Certification Courses
- Cyber Security Certification Courses
- Artificial Intelligence Certification Courses
- Business Analytics Certification Courses
- Data Science Certification Courses
- Cloud Computing Certification Courses
- Machine Learning Certification Courses
- View All Certification Courses
Resources
-
Medicine and Allied Sciences
Colleges
Predictors
Resources
-
Law
Resources
Colleges
-
Animation and Design
Exams
Predictors & Articles
Colleges
Resources
-
Media, Mass Communication and Journalism
Colleges
Resources
-
Finance & Accounts
Top Courses & Careers
Colleges
Get Answers to all your Questions
Q2) FACT: FabriCo, a manufacturer of textiles, has a set of standing orders that describe the company's employment policies, code of conduct, and disciplinary procedures. These Standing Orders are conspicuously placed at the building's entryway. After two weeks, the newly hired employee Rohit was let go due to a pattern of late. Rohit alleges that because he was not aware of the punctuality criteria, his termination was unfair.
Question:
Is Rohit's assertion that he was not aware of the Standing Orders, as displayed by FabriCo, a sufficient defence against his termination for tardiness?
A) Definitely, as new hires like Rohit might not be instantly conversant with all business policies.
B) No, as the Standing Orders are prominently displayed and appear to be expected knowledge by employees.
C) The answer is yes, as the business should offer distinct orientation courses to familiarise staff with the Standing Orders.
D) Not unless Rohit can demonstrate that he was never made aware of the Standing Orders or introduced to them.
Answers (1)
Standing orders are important because they lay out clear expectations and rules for employees. Rohit's claim of ignorance is insufficient justification for his actions because FabriCo made sure that its employees have easy access to these instructions by prominently displaying them.
