R, a cricket enthusiast, purchases a ticket to watch a T20 match organised by the Indian Premier League (IPL). During the match, a ball struck for six hits R on his body and injures him. He sues IPL for compensation for the medical expenses.
R should be compensated as he purchased the ticket to get entertainment and not get injured.
R would fail in his action, as he voluntarily exposed himself to the risk.
IPL would be liable as it did not ensure that the spectators were protected from the risk of such injuries.
None of the above.
A person has no legal remedy for an injury caused by an act to which he has consented. Hence the corrrect option is b.