Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa

Ramarao’s neighbour was running a small printing establishment in his house. Though it created a lot of ruckus at times, the neighbourhood found it tolerable. One-day, Ramarao’s aged father came to his house to convalesce after a major operation. He found the noise intolerable. Ramarao took up the matter with his neighbour and the latter refused to oblige him. As a result, Ramarao’s father died on account of the irritation. Ramarao filed a suit to close the press.

Option: 1

Ramarao would win, because his neighbour interfered in his right, to relax in his own house.


Option: 2

Ramarao would win, because his neighbour did not oblige him even after knowing the serious condition of Ramarao’s father.


Option: 3

Ramarao would lose, because his neighbour need not take into the individual problems of every neighbour around.


Option: 4

Ramarao would lose, because his father’s condition made him a sensitive plaintiff.


Answers (1)

best_answer

Here the fact that the neighbourhood found it tolerable was testament to that that the act was not unreasonable. Secondly, if the act were to usually caused deaths, it would not be termed reasonable. However, Ramarao’s father’s death was caused allegedly because of the said act, but due to the preceding statement, we can safely say that it was unreasonable only in this case, whereas for others it was not. Hence, his father was a sensitive plaintiff, who was, additionally, brought to the nuisance. Hence, the correct option is d. 

Posted by

Gunjita

View full answer