Browse by Stream
QnA
Home
QnA
Go To Your Study Dashboard

Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa
  • Home
  • Law
  • What did the Supreme Court clarify in the case of "All India Judges' Association v. Union of India (2002)" regarding the term "distinguished jurist"?<div class='qna-opti

What did the Supreme Court clarify in the case of "All India Judges' Association v. Union of India (2002)" regarding the term "distinguished jurist"?

Option: 1

Distinguished jurists must have prior judicial experience.


Option: 2

Distinguished jurists should only be retired judges.


Option: 3

The term "distinguished jurist" can encompass legal experts with significant contributions to the field of law.


Option: 4

Distinguished jurists must have served as practicing lawyers for a minimum of 30 years.


Answers (1)

best_answer

In the case of "All India Judges' Association v. Union of India (2002)," the Supreme Court clarified that the term "distinguished jurist" is not narrowly defined and can encompass legal experts who have made significant contributions to the field of law. This means that distinguished jurists are not limited to individuals with prior judicial experience or retired judges.

Posted by

HARSH KANKARIA

View full answer

Similar Questions

Trending Articles/News

anam-khan

CLAT 2025 Hearing LIVE: Delhi HC seeks response from Consortium in 2 weeks; next hearing on April 7
anam-khan

CLAT PG counselling 2025 dates soon for LLM; category-wise expected cut-offs for top NLUs
anam-khan

CLAT 2025 counselling likely to begin after Delhi HC hearing on March 3; selection process explained

Latest Question