Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa

If A due kept a wild dog at his home and his dog ran and got out of control and caused injuries to C. is A strictly liable for his acts even though he had no intention do so and took reasonable care ?


 

Option: 1

Yes, he is strictly liable

 

 


Option: 2

 

No, he is not strictly liable

 

 


Option: 3

 

Yes, he is jointly liable

 

 


Option: 4

 

None of the above

 


Answers (1)

best_answer

Strict liability is a legal doctrine that places responsibility on a person or entity for harm or damage they cause, regardless of their intent or negligence. Hence, (a) is the correct option.

 

Posted by

Ritika Jonwal

View full answer