Q5) Fact: According to the Realist School of Jurisprudence, rather than the impersonal statutes, the law is defined by the actual results of legal decisions. It focuses on the actual impacts of legal decisions on society as well as how the law functions in practical situations. Despite the fact that a recent judgement may have been based on well-established legal principles, Dr. Ishaan, a legal professor, criticises it, contending that while it may have positive theoretical implications for the community in question.
Question:
What would the major issue with the current judgement be based on Dr. Ishaan's critique and the Realist School's tenets?
A) The ruling lacks a foundation in recognised legal concepts.
B) The decision disregards historical conventions and traditions.
C) The ruling, despite having a solid legal foundation, negatively impacts the neighbourhood.
D) A higher court hasn't confirmed the verdict.
Beyond merely theoretical or doctrinal explanations, the Realist School places emphasis on the consequences and results of legal decisions in real-life situations. In keeping with this school, Dr. Ishaan's criticism emphasises the judgment's detrimental practical effects on the impacted population, even though the judgement follows well-established legal concepts.hence option c is correct option .