Which of the following statements best explains the legal requirements for maintenance in the context of Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)?
Live-in partnerships are not covered by Section 125 of the CrPC, which only applies to couples who are legally married
Irrespective of the husband's salary, Section 125 mandates a set sum of support.
Irrespective of the husband's salary, Section 125 mandates a set sum of support.
If a person's wife, child, or parents are unable to support themselves, the court may compel that person to pay them maintenance on a monthly basis under Section 125 of the CrPC.
A secular provision in the CrPC called Section 125 offers those who are unable to support themselves with a legal remedy. It can be used against someone who has the money to support them but neglects or refuses to do so by the wife, small children, or even the parents.
Through a number of judicial interpretations throughout time, Section 125's purview has been widened. As made clear by numerous court rulings that recognised the rights of women in live-in relationships under specific circumstances, it is not limited to partners who are officially married. Option A is inaccurate as a result.
Although the clause does include provisions for minor children's support, it is not just about them. B is the incorrect answer. hence D is the correct option