Browse by Stream
QnA
Home
QnA
Go To Your Study Dashboard

Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa
  • Home
  • Law
  • The issue, 'whether Section 377 of the IPC is violative of Artciles 21, 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India' was decided in which of the following case?<stron

The issue, 'whether Section 377 of the IPC is violative of Artciles 21, 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India' was decided in which of the following case?

Option: 1

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India.


Option: 2

Visakha v. State of Rajasthan


Option: 3

Shayara Bano v. Union of India


Option: 4

Naz Foundation vs. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. 


Answers (1)

best_answer

The Delhi High Court ruled in 2009 in the case of Naz Foundation vs. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. that Section 377 cannot be used to punish sex between two consenting adults – this violates the right to privacy and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. Hence the correct optino is d. 

Posted by

vishal kumar

View full answer

Similar Questions

Trending Articles/News

anam-khan

CLAT 2025 Hearing LIVE: Delhi HC seeks response from Consortium in 2 weeks; next hearing on April 7
anam-khan

CLAT PG counselling 2025 dates soon for LLM; category-wise expected cut-offs for top NLUs
anam-khan

CLAT 2025 counselling likely to begin after Delhi HC hearing on March 3; selection process explained

Latest Question