-
Engineering and Architecture
Exams
Colleges
Predictors
Resources
-
Computer Application and IT
Quick Links
Colleges
-
Pharmacy
Colleges
Resources
-
Hospitality and Tourism
Colleges
Resources
Diploma Colleges
-
Competition
Other Exams
Resources
-
School
Exams
Top Schools
Products & Resources
-
Study Abroad
Top Countries
Student Visas
-
Arts, Commerce & Sciences
Exams
Colleges
Upcoming Events
Resources
-
Management and Business Administration
Colleges & Courses
Predictors
-
Learn
Online Courses
Engineering Preparation
Medical Preparation
-
Online Courses and Certifications
Top Streams
Specializations
- Digital Marketing Certification Courses
- Cyber Security Certification Courses
- Artificial Intelligence Certification Courses
- Business Analytics Certification Courses
- Data Science Certification Courses
- Cloud Computing Certification Courses
- Machine Learning Certification Courses
- View All Certification Courses
Resources
-
Medicine and Allied Sciences
Colleges
Predictors
Resources
-
Law
Resources
Colleges
-
Animation and Design
Exams
Predictors & Articles
Colleges
Resources
-
Media, Mass Communication and Journalism
Colleges
Resources
-
Finance & Accounts
Top Courses & Careers
Colleges
Get Answers to all your Questions
The Supreme Court ruled in the Shah Bano case that a Muslim woman has the right to ask her ex-husband for maintenance under Section 125 of the CrPC, and that this right lasts after the "iddat" period. The case was important because it addressed Muslim women's post-divorce support rights.
Under Section 125 of the CrPC, a Muslim woman cannot request maintenance.
A Muslim woman only has a right to maintenance throughout the 'iddat' period.
Even during the 'iddat' period, a Muslim woman may seek support under Section 125 of the CrPC
A Muslim woman can only be entitled to maintenance if it is specified in the'mehr'.
Answers (1)
In Shabana Bano v. Imran Khan, the Supreme Court upheld the right of a Muslim woman to request support under Section 125 of the CrPC even while she is in the 'iddat' period. The court's ruling emphasised Section 125's secular intent, which is to protect people from destitution regardless of their religious inclinations. hence, option C is the correct option.
