Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa

Both natural and juristic persons are given rights and obligations by the law in the state of Jurisland. Tom, a Jurisland resident, signed a contract with the well-known business WidgetCo. Tom claimed that WidgetCo shouldn't be granted the same contractual rights as he is since WidgetCo is a juristic person and doesn't have the same sentiments, emotions, or consciousness that actual people do.

 

Which of the following concerns the conflict between Tom and WidgetCo the most?

Option: 1

 Is WidgetCo a successful business in Jurisland?


Option: 2

Has Tom ever been in a legal battle over a contract with another company?


Option: 3

Based on characteristics like emotions and consciousness, does Jurisland's legal system distinguish between the contractual rights of natural and juristic persons?


Option: 4

Since when does WidgetCo operate in Jurisland?


Answers (1)

best_answer

The main question is whether Jurisland's legal system draws distinctions between natural and juristic people based on inborn characteristics like emotions. This distinction serves as the foundation of Tom's argument, making it the most pertinent query to address. Hence option c is correct option .

Posted by

vishal kumar

View full answer