Browse by Stream
QnA
Home
QnA
Go To Your Study Dashboard

Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa
  • Home
  • Law
  • Emma hires a security company to protect her jewellery store. Despite the security company’s presence, a

Emma hires a security company to protect her jewellery store. Despite the security company’s presence, a group of burglars manages to break in and steal valuable items.

Option: 1

The security company is not liable as they cannot prevent all crimes.


Option: 2

The security company is liable only if they were negligent in their duties.


Option: 3

The security company is liable regardless of their level of diligence.


Option: 4

The security company is not liable as Emma should have insured her jewellery.


Answers (1)

best_answer

 In a contract of indemnity, the party providing indemnity (in this case, the security company) is responsible for any loss or damage incurred by the other party (in this case, Emma). However, the liability of the security company depends on whether they were negligent in performing their duties. If they took all reasonable precautions and followed industry standards, they may not be liable. Hence correct option is b.

Posted by

shivangi.shekhar

View full answer

Similar Questions

Trending Articles/News

anam-khan

CLAT 2025 Hearing LIVE: Delhi HC seeks response from Consortium in 2 weeks; next hearing on April 7
anam-khan

CLAT PG counselling 2025 dates soon for LLM; category-wise expected cut-offs for top NLUs
anam-khan

CLAT 2025 counselling likely to begin after Delhi HC hearing on March 3; selection process explained

Latest Question