Browse by Stream
QnA
Home
QnA
Go To Your Study Dashboard

Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa
  • Home
  • Law
  • Krishnan and Kannan were neighbours in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and this typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of co

Krishnan and Kannan were neighbours in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and this typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous, noise. He filed a suit against Kannan. 

Option: 1

Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing classes in his house.


Option: 2

Kannan is liable, because as a neighbour, he should have realised. Krishnan’s delicate nature.


Option: 3

Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Krishnan.


Option: 4

Kannan is liable, since using his house, within a residential area, as a typing class was not reasonable


Answers (1)

best_answer

Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person’s use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking, into account surrounding situation. Here, Kannan is liable, since using his house, within a residential area, as a typing class was not reasonable. Hence the correct option is d. 

Posted by

jitender.kumar

View full answer

Similar Questions

Trending Articles/News

anam-khan

CLAT 2025 Hearing LIVE: Delhi HC seeks response from Consortium in 2 weeks; next hearing on April 7
anam-khan

CLAT PG counselling 2025 dates soon for LLM; category-wise expected cut-offs for top NLUs

Latest Question