Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa

People who have been labelled "lunatics" by the appropriate authorities are typically seen as being unable to sign contracts in the republic of Sanitas. During sporadic moments of mental infirmity, Mr. Krish, a well-known artist, was labelled a "lunatic" and was later diagnosed with a severe mental condition. In one instance, he offered ArtHouse Galleries a price far below what a valuable painting would have sold for on the open market. Mr. Krish attempted to have the transaction revoked after regaining his sanity by arguing that he was insane at the time the contract was signed. The sale was legal, according to ArtHouse Galleries.

 

Which of the following concerns the legal conflict between Mr. Krish and ArtHouse Galleries the most?

Option: 1

How many of Mr. Krish's paintings have he sold in the last 12 months?


Option: 2

When Mr. Krish signed the contract with ArtHouse Galleries, was he experiencing one of his episodes of mental incompetence, as determined by a qualified authority?


Option: 3

How much are Mr. Krish's paintings currently selling for on the open market?


Option: 4

Has ArtHouse Galleries ever had to deal with artists that have mental health issues?


Answers (1)

best_answer

 The question of whether Mr. Krish was legally capable of entering into a contract at the time of the sale is the main focus of this argument. It is essential to decide whether he was insane, as defined by Sanitas' legal standards and determined by the competent authorities, in order to judge whether the contract is valid. hence option b is correct option .

Posted by

himanshu.meshram

View full answer