Rahul and Yash are friends. Rahul loses his dog, Sheru , in a market. Yash enquires about it with Rahul and out of affection for Rahul he starts searching for Sheru. The next day Rahul advertises to pay Rs. 1000 as a reward to whoever can find Sheru. Yash finds Sheru in the evening. Yash asks for the reward from Rahul. Rahul refuses saying that he did not intend to give any money to Yash. Was there a valid agreement between Rahul and Yash?
Yes. But Rahul need not pay any reward to Yash.
No. Rahul needs to pay the reward as it was subjected to everyone.
Yes. Rahul needs to pay the reward, as Yash became an offeree the moment Rahul advertised.
No. And Rahul need not pay any reward to Yash.
No, there was no valid agreement between Rahul and Yash as there was no consideration or promise of the same. Yash anter out of his affection for Rahul. hence option d is correct.