Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa

Q3) The Historical School of Jurisprudence holds that historical occurrences, popular conventions, and traditions have affected and developed the law. It claims that the progressive development of legal ideas is impacted by the historical events of society. Mr. Kartik, a legal expert, contends that a certain statute has evolved over ages and has origins in old conventions, hence he is opposed to its sudden modification.

Question:

What would be the main argument against the sudden alteration of the abovementioned statute, according to Mr. Kartik's case and the theories of the Historical School?

Option: 1

A) The moral principles of all people serve as the foundation of the law.


Option: 2

B) The fact that the law was passed by an authorised body gives it legality.


Option: 3

C) The society's past practises, traditions, and learnings are reflected in the law.


Option: 4

D) The law is currently supported by the majority of the populace.


Answers (1)

best_answer

The Historical School places a strong emphasis on how deeply ingrained a society's laws are in its historical events, traditions, and customs. According to this school of thought, Mr. Kartik's argument emphasises the historical importance of the law and how it has changed through time, arguing that any hasty alteration would violate this historical continuity.hence option C is correct option. 

Posted by

sudhir.kumar

View full answer