Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa

Q1) Fact: According to the Natural Law School of Jurisprudence, there are some unchangeable laws present in nature that can be identified using human reason. This school's adherents hold that these laws supersede all other laws, and that any law that conflicts with them is unfair and ought not to be followed. A certain laws, despite being expressly stated and having been passed by the legislative body, should not be applied, according to Mr. Alok, a lawyer, who makes this claim in court. He claims that doing so would go against the principles of natural justice.

Question:

What is the main argument against the implementation of the specific statute, according to Mr. Alok's reasoning and the Natural Law School?

Option: 1

A) The majority of people dislike the statute.


Option: 2

B) The statute's documentation is incomplete.


Option: 3

C) The law violates the unchangeable, natural rules that can be understood by human reason


Option: 4

D) The majority of the legislative body did not approve the statute before it was passed.


Answers (1)

best_answer

According to the Natural Law School, rules that go against fundamental natural laws that can be understood by human reason are unjust. This idea serves as the foundation for Mr. Alok's main objection to the law, which emphasises how it goes against natural justice principles.hence option C is correct option .

Posted by

Divya Prakash Singh

View full answer