Browse by Stream
QnA
Home
QnA
Go To Your Study Dashboard

Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa
  • Home
  • Law
  • The plaintiff who was the captain of the ship worked as a crew member and the defendant, Laird, was not aware abo

The plaintiff who was the captain of the ship worked as a crew member and the defendant, Laird, was not aware about it. Later, the plaintiff claimed the salary of a crew member to which the defendant declined. Decide

Option: 1

There is an contractual agreement.


Option: 2

There is no contractual agreement as there was no communication of offer.


Option: 3

There is no contractual agreement as there was no acceptance to offer.


Option: 4

None of the above.


Answers (1)

best_answer

There was no contractual agreement as there was no communication of offer. Without communication there can be no offer and hence no acceptance and agreement. Even the implied contract requires meeting of minds. Hence correct option is b.

Posted by

admin

View full answer

Similar Questions

Trending Articles/News

anam-khan

Revise CLAT 2025 results, republish merit list in four weeks: Delhi High Court tells Consortium of NLUs
anam-khan

Intend to complete CLAT UG hearing at earliest for results to be declared: Delhi HC
anam-khan

CLAT 2025 LIVE: Delhi High Court reserves UG verdict, PG hearing on April 21

Latest Question