Browse by Stream
QnA
Home
QnA
Go To Your Study Dashboard

Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa
  • Home
  • Law
  • What was the main argument made in the State of Andhra Pradesh v. Raja Ram Rao (1962) case about

What was the main argument made in the State of Andhra Pradesh v. Raja Ram Rao (1962) case about the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937?

Option: 1

The Act permitted women to be the only legitimate heirs of ancestors' property


Option: 2

The Act sought to provide men and women the same property rights.


Option: 3

The Act's applicability to agricultural lands was in question.


Option: 4

Women were allowed to serve as trustees for ancestry property under the Act.


Answers (1)

best_answer

The Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937, and its applicability to agricultural properties were the main issues in the State of Andhra Pradesh v. Raja Ram Rao case. Whether the Act might preempt state laws governing agricultural land was the subject of debate. hence option c is correct

Posted by

Ritika Jonwal

View full answer

Similar Questions

Trending Articles/News

anam-khan

Revise CLAT 2025 results, republish merit list in four weeks: Delhi High Court tells Consortium of NLUs
anam-khan

Intend to complete CLAT UG hearing at earliest for results to be declared: Delhi HC
anam-khan

CLAT 2025 LIVE: Delhi High Court reserves UG verdict, PG hearing on April 21

Latest Question