Directions for question :
The interview panel at IIM Calcutta decided to interview eight candidates – Mr Partha, Mr Quereshi, Dr Ratan (MBBS), Mr Subir, Mr Tanmoy, Mr Umesh, Mr Vittal and Mr William, on the 24th January 2023. All the eight candidates were practicing professionals -- four being engineers, two being accountants, one being a professor in English and one being a general physician. Each candidate had scored a different percentile in CAT 2022.
It was decided that each candidate would be called at forty minute intervals starting from 11.00 am on 26th February 2023 at the Tata Hall in the IIM Calcutta campus.
It was also known that :
a) Mr Williams was the English professor with a 99.97 percentile
b) Mr Quereshi, who had a 98.87 percentile was called at 1.00 pm
c) Mr Partha was the accountant who was called at 2.20 pm
d) Dr Ratan (MBBS) was called after 2.20 pm
e) Neither the first nor the last interviewee was an engineer
f) Mr Umesh, who had scored 99.43 percentile was an engineer
g) The engineer with a percentile of 98.35 was called at 12.20 pm
Question :
If Mr Tanmoy was called at 1.40 pm and Mr Vittal at 3.00 pm, then which of the following options may not be definitely correct ?
Dr Ratan (MBBS) was called more than four hours after Mr William
Mr Subir had a percentile of 98.35
Mr Umesh was called at 11.40 am
Mr Quereshi was an engineer
Tabulating the originally given data given would yield the following :
Time | 11.00 am | 11.40 am | 12.20 pm | 1.00 pm | 1.40 pm | 2.20 pm | 3.00 pm | 3.40 pm |
Name | Mr. Quereshi | Mr.Partha | ||||||
Profession | Engineer | Accountant | ||||||
Percentile | 98.35 | 98.87 |
Now, if Mr Tanmoy was called at 1.40 pm and Mr Vittal at 3.00 pm, then :
Time | 11.00 am | 11.40 am | 12.20 pm | 1.00 pm | 1.40 pm | 2.20 pm | 3.00 pm | 3.40 pm |
Name | Mr. Quereshi | Mr. Tanmoy | Mr.Partha | Mr.Vittal | ||||
Profession | Engineer | Accountant | ||||||
Percentile | 98.35 | 98.87 |
Dr Ratan (MBBS) was called after 2.20 pm (d). Hence Dr Ratan (MBBS) was called at 3.40 pm, as that was the only vacant slot after 2.20 pm. Mr William who was the English professor (a) could hence be called at either 1) 11.00 am or 2) 11.40 am.
Case 1)
Time | 11.00 am | 11.40 am | 12.20 pm | 1.00 pm | 1.40 pm | 2.20 pm | 3.00 pm | 3.40 pm |
Name | Mr. William | Mr. Quereshi | Mr. Tanmoy | Mr.Partha | Mr. Vittal | Dr Ratan | ||
Profession | Professor | Engineer | Accountant | Gen Prac | ||||
Percentile | 99.97 | 98.35 | 98.87 |
Case 2)
Time | 11.00 am | 11.40 am | 12.20 pm | 1.00 pm | 1.40 pm | 2.20 pm | 3.00 pm | 3.40 pm |
Name | Mr. William | Mr. Quereshi | Mr. Tanmoy | Mr.Partha | Mr.Vittal | Dr. Ratan | ||
Profession | Professor | Engineer | Accountant | Gen Prac | ||||
Percentile | 99.97 | 98.35 | 98.87 |
But, Mr Umesh, who had scored 99.43 percentile was an engineer (f). But Case 2 would not be able to accommodate the condition, as neither the first nor the last interviewee was an engineer (e). Hence Case 2 is invalid.
But in Case 1, Mr Umesh had to be the one called in the 11.40 am slot. So Mr Subir was the one called at the 12.20 pm slot.
Thus :
Case 1)
Time | 11.00 am | 11.40 am | 12.20 pm | 1.00 pm | 1.40 pm | 2.20 pm | 3.00 pm | 3.40 pm |
Name | Mr. William | Mr. Umesh | Mr.Subir | Mr. Quereshi | Mr. Tanmoy | Mr.Partha | Mr. Vittal | Dr Ratan |
Profession | Professor | Engineer | Engineer | Accountant | Gen Prac | |||
Percentile | 99.97 | 99.43 | 98.35 | 98.87 |
Thus,
Dr Ratan (MBBS) was called after 4 hours 40 minutes after Mr William
Mr Subir, an engineer, had a percentile of 98.35
Mr Umesh was called at 11.40 am
Either Mr Quereshi and Mr Tanmoy, or Mr Quereshi and Mr Vittal, or Mr Tanmoy and Mr Vittal were the remaining two engineers.
Hence, if Mr Tanmoy was called at 1.40 pm and Mr Vittal at 3.00 pm, then the option stating that Mr Quereshi was an engineer may not be definitely correct.