Get Answers to all your Questions

header-bg qa

Considering a hypothetical scenario where you are engaged in the development of a novel pharmaceutical compound, intriguing findings have emerged from human trials. Upon administration of this compound, a significant increase in urine volume has been observed. However, simultaneous administration of antidiuretic hormone (ADH or vasopressin) restores urine volume to normal levels. Which hypothesis among the following options presents the most plausible explanation for these observations related to the mechanism of action of the new drug?

Option: 1

Induces blockade of ADH receptors on the renal collecting ducts.


Option: 2

Provokes inhibition of ADH release from the pituitary gland.


Option: 3

Initiates mimicry of ADH's physiological actions.


Option: 4

Elicits a reduction in blood pressure.


Answers (1)

best_answer

In the given hypothetical scenario, the most plausible explanation for the observed effects of the new drug can be attributed to option 2: "Provokes inhibition of ADH release from the pituitary gland." When the new drug is administered, it somehow interferes with the release of ADH from the pituitary gland. As a result, the normal feedback mechanism that regulates urine volume through ADH is disrupted, leading to a substantial increase in urine production. However, when ADH is administered concurrently with the new drug, it counteracts the drug's effect and restores urine volume to normal levels. This suggests that the new drug interferes with the release or synthesis of ADH, leading to altered urine production.Hence, the correct answer is option 2.

Posted by

jitender.kumar

View full answer

NEET 2024 Most scoring concepts

    Just Study 32% of the NEET syllabus and Score up to 100% marks